The Spectator

Brown’s green dilemma

The publication of the Stern report on the economics of climate change was a deeply significant political punctuation mark.

issue 04 November 2006

The publication of the Stern report on the economics of climate change was a deeply significant political punctuation mark. On Monday Tony Blair declared that the document was ‘the most important report on the future which I have received since becoming Prime Minister’. Yet it will not be Mr Blair who faces the formidable task of selling the report to the British public, legislating accordingly and urging other countries to follow suit. That task will fall to the man who is all but certain to succeed him: Gordon Brown.

Sir Nicholas Stern’s findings are the work of a seasoned economist rather than of a green campaigner. Not everybody accepts his conclusions. On Tuesday Mohammed Barkindo, secretary-general of Opec, claimed that the review’s scenarios ‘have no foundations in either science or economics’. Nigel Lawson, a formidable opponent of woolly thinking on climate change, has urged scepticism. Nonetheless, the extent of the political consensus on Stern is striking: remarkably, no mainstream party now disputes the case for higher green taxes.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in