Susanna Gross

Bridge | 5 December 2013

issue 07 December 2013

One of the most dramatic events of the Spanish American War was the sinking of the cargo ship Merrimac. Early in 1898, a bold plan was hatched by the US navy to rig the Merrimac with explosives, sail it into the narrow channel leading into Santiago harbour, then blow it up — thereby blocking the Spanish fleet within the harbour. As it was basically a suicide mission, the skeleton crew of just eight men were all volunteers.

In the end, the mission failed: the Merrimac’s steering gear was damaged by enemy fire and, despite sinking, the vessel failed to block the channel. Although they were captured, the crew did at least survive — and after a prisoner swap the following month, they returned home as heroes.

Today, there are probably more bridge players than historians who know about the daring mission. We’ve borrowed its name for a clever defensive manouevre, the Merrimac Coup — which, as you might expect, involves the deliberate sacrifice of an honour in order to block the opponents’ communications.

Get Britain's best politics newsletters

Register to get The Spectator's insight and opinion straight to your inbox. You can then read two free articles each week.

Already a subscriber? Log in

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in