I’ve recently been reading Daphne du Maurier’s novel Rebecca to my children, and while it’s every bit as enjoyable as I remember, I’ve been bristling with embarrassment at the unflattering references to bridge in the first few chapters. The narrator is a paid companion to the grotesquely snobby Mrs van Hopper, who, we are told several times, loves nothing more than passing her evenings with her equally snobby circle of friends playing — well, your and my favourite game.
Yet again, I found myself wishing that I’d chosen the altogether cooler game of poker, which has never suffered such stereotypical slurs. But would I really have preferred it? Although the two games have much in common, I’m convinced that bridge is ultimately the more complex and skilful. Moreover, it can be just as exciting in terms of dare and bluff. The American bridge star Steve Weinstein — also a professional poker player — often demonstrates the point, bringing a thrilling psychological edge to both games.
Susanna Gross
Bridge | 30 May 2019
issue 01 June 2019
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in