Susanna Gross

Bridge | 21 April 2016

issue 23 April 2016

Bridge is such an unforgiving game; you can’t afford to take your eye off the ball for a single moment. Take, for example, the penalty for revoking. There you are, concentrating fiercely, counting the cards — and suddenly you realise you’ve done something as idiotic as fail to follow suit. You try to correct your mistake, apologise. But no, declarer is determined to take full advantage. He calls for the director, who tells you that the card must remain face up on the table — like a beacon of shame — and that you must play it at the first opportunity. Your humiliation is complete when this turns out to be the only way to let the contract through.

Players have every right to insist on their rights, of course. But I do relish stories of it backfiring.

Get Britain's best politics newsletters

Register to get The Spectator's insight and opinion straight to your inbox. You can then read two free articles each week.

Already a subscriber? Log in

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in