After a seven year wait, the Chilcot Report has come back with some quite damning conclusions about the build-up to the 2003 invasion, and the lack of planning for post-war Iraq. I think we’ve certainly learned our lesson about not changing a country’s entire political set up without a credible alternative in place – that will never happen again, thank God.
I’m particularly interested by one note Tony Blair sent to George Bush on March 26th, 2003, a week before the invasion, in which he said the ‘fundamental goal’ of the war should be to create a new ‘world order’. ‘This is the moment when you can define international priorities for the next generation – the true post-Cold War world order. Our ambition is big – to construct a global agenda around which we can unite the world.’
Blair said the war was part of a bigger plan to ‘spread our values of freedom, democracy, tolerance and the rule of law… That’s why, though Iraq’s WMD is the immediate justification for action, ridding Iraq of Saddam is the real prize.’
Democracy and tolerance.
A lot of people still believe the invasion was about oil, which as Stephen Bush once said ‘only makes sense in a low-budget Saturday morning children’s cartoon‘.
I think rather that Tony Blair genuinely wanted to make Iraq, and the world, a better place, and that’s what made him so dangerous. Democracy
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in