Keith Budge

Are the sciences and the arts a false dichotomy?

issue 14 March 2015

In late 2014, the Secretary of State for Education declared that the days when arts and humanities subjects could be relied on as useful were behind us, and that STEM subjects (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) were the way to go. For all of her subsequent backpedaling on this point, it remains pretty clear that arts and humanities are considered soft and irrelevant by this government.

STEM subjects are vital, of course, and I welcome the Prime Minister’s recent announcement of a government push on maths, science and technology in schools, and a new national college for digital skills and coding. Nonetheless, I remain concerned about this instinct to promote STEM subjects at the expense of a wider education. It needn’t be a zero sum game.

Perhaps it’s no surprise that people invested in the arts should come out in their defence when they see them threatened. I – and Bedales – fall into this category: we are alarmed that the arts and humanities have been effectively banished to the margins of the national curriculum.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in