The cautionary tale of the Co-operative Bank, its black hole and its naughty chairman has recently taught us that if a financial institution has the reputation of being dull, earnest and set in its ways, it probably isn’t. The collapse last year of Switzerland’s oldest private bank, Wegelin & Co — whose boss once claimed that being small and provincial made it ‘easy to avoid the deadly emotions of greed and fear’ — was another example. Attention now turns to Standard Chartered, an overseas commercial bank that has long had the reputation of sticking cautiously to the mode of business in which it has historic roots, notably in Asia, and has seen off repeated takeover approaches from others jealous of its franchise. Its chief executive, Peter Sands, in post since 2006, is widely regarded as a safe pair of hands; its chairman, Sir John Peace, bears no resemblance at all to the Revd Paul Flowers; its balance sheet looked relatively comfortable throughout the bad years — and a big fine for US sanctions-busting in 2012 was passed off as an unfortunate blip.
But suddenly the bank has announced the departure of two key executives below Sands and is under fire from a short-selling bond player, Carson Block, who claims it is sitting on piles of toxic loan assets.
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in