The latest mis-selling scandal is one more symptom of a deeper problem
The payment protection insurance (PPI) scandal is, by common consensus, the worst case of financial mis-selling until the next one. These policies were foisted by banks on personal borrowers, supposedly to cover repayments if they fell ill or lost their jobs or encountered some other misfortune. But in many cases borrowers were not aware they were being charged for the cover, or were told falsely that they were obliged to buy it. If they were self-employed or too old, they would never have been able to claim on it anyway. Now the banks, led by Lloyds and Barclays, have abandoned their legal challenge against retrospective changes in FSA rules on selling PPI, and estimates of compensation required to placate offended borrowers are at £6 billion and rising.
Who will pay for that? The banks’ poor bloody shareholders, that’s who, and not their grossly overpaid top executives, who will remind us that they were many layers removed from branch staff who failed to read the small print of the PPI product before flogging it — just as insurance salesmen inadvertently mis-sold personal pensions a generation ago.
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in