Old age is in the news at the moment because people may not be financially prepared for retirement. But old age has much more interesting questions to consider, and none more interesting than its conclusion. The Roman philosopher-statesman Seneca (ad 1-65) makes some most interesting observations on the matter.
Seneca, being a Stoic, takes the view that death is no evil, and therefore suicide is a rational act. ‘In my opinion, old age is not to be refused any more than it is to be craved,’ he argues. ‘It is very agreeable to enjoy one’s own company as long as possible, on condition that one has ensured it is worth enjoying. The question we have to face is — should we treat extreme old age with disdain and take matters into our own hands, rather than just waiting for it to come?’
Arguing that the man who clings to life for the sake of it is like a drunkard who sucks up even the dregs, Seneca concludes that he would not abandon his old age as long as it preserved him ‘intact as regards the better part of myself. But if old age begins to destroy my mind and pull apart its various faculties, leaving me breathing but not living, I shall immediately evacuate this crumbling and tottering residence. I shall not use death to escape illness, if it can be cured and does not interfere with the spirit. Nor shall I commit suicide merely because of pain; to die like that is to be defeated. But if I find that my suffering is inescapable, I shall take my leave, not because of the suffering, but because it will get in the way of all the reasons I have for living.
Comments
Join the debate for just £1 a month
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for £3.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just £1 a monthAlready a subscriber? Log in