When the Ballets Russes first presented Fokine’s Polovtsian Dances at Covent Garden in 1911, such was its orgiastic savagery that ladies in the audience were said to be genuinely terrified that its grease-painted warriors were about to leap off the stage and ravish them. The Mongol Khan, a great hit imported from Ulan Bator, may not induce genteel screaming, but it has some awe-inspiring moments and belongs in the same ersatz orientalist tradition as Fokine’s ballet – primitive Asiatic culture made colourfully palatable to western tastes.
It is based on a 1998 play by Lkhagvasuren Bavuu, the ‘People’s Writer of Mongolia’, about a violent dynastic struggle among the Hunnic tribes that flourished, mythically at least, around the beginning of the Christian era. The passages of dialogue we hear, adapted for London by Timberlake Wertenbaker and surtitled, are played out in Mongolian and enacted by native actors in flamboyantly semaphored style, but a plot revolving round babies swapped at birth and vengeful psychopaths roaring their heads off is frankly not that engaging.
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in