Martin Vander Weyer Martin Vander Weyer

All those boardroom codes still can’t catch rogues and incompetents

More than 20 years after the Cadbury report, the rules are a boon for headhunters but no one else. Plus: the Bourneville legacy, and the Queen’s stewardship of the family firm

issue 12 September 2015

Sir Adrian Cadbury, who has died aged 86, is remembered as the author in 1992 of a first stab at a corporate governance code for public companies — which thereafter were expected to show ‘Cadbuarial correctness’ in the separation of chief executive and chairman and the powers of non-executive directors. Cadbury’s work was taken forward by the 1995 Greenbury report, the 1998 Hampel report, the Higgs review in 2003 and a subsequent drawing-together into a ‘Combined Code’. Finally Vince Cable, as business secretary, left his own mark by setting a target of 25 per cent women on FTSE100 boards by this year.

So we now have a fat compendium of boardroom compliance — that has not obviously led to better decision-making, higher ethics or improved shareholder value. Sir Adrian himself, right at the beginning of this process, observed that ‘codes will not catch rogues’, but the weaknesses of the system have proved much broader than that.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in