Sarah Bradford

A typically Tuscan joke

issue 20 November 2004

There is something irresistible about forgers, cocking a snook as they do at their target establishments — in this case the formidable intellectual and historical talents of Baroque (hardly Renaissance as the title claims) Rome, a circle which included the towering figure of the polymath Athanasius Kircher. What makes this case even more piquant is that the forger was a 19-year-old Tuscan nobleman, Curzio Inghirami, and the forged manuscripts posing as important Etruscan relics were wrapped in his 13-year-old sister’s hair.

The discovery in November 1634 of these odd capsules known as scarith, scaritti, allegedly took place on a fishing expedition by the Inghiramis on the river below their villa of Scornello, perched on a hill overlooking the ancient Etruscan city of Volterra. They purported to contain, written on linen rag-paper, the prophecies of the Augur Prospero of Fiesole, which included, among other things, his prediction of the coming of the Messiah. They were greeted with extreme excitement in Florence, then the seat of the Grand Duchy of Tuscany, as proof of the superior (and anterior) civilisation of their Etruscan ancestors to that of the upstart Romans who had finally conquered them. The scarith, Inghirami and his family claimed, ‘begin with Noah, founder of Volterra, and contain a continuous series over 1,800 years of 55 Tuscan Kings, the foundation of the 12 cities [of the Etruscan League]….’ Within three years of the ‘discovery’ of the scarith, Curzio published a handsome book of the texts they contained, entitled Ethruscarum Antiquitatum Fragmenta.

This bold publication brought the matter to the attention of the international scholars based in Rome round the Barberini Pope, Urban VIII, who had recently condemned for heresy and presumption another far more famous Tuscan, Galileo. The documents were revealed as obvious forgeries: quite apart from the fact that it was well known that the Etruscans wrote on linen cloth and that paper was unknown to them, many of the predictions were clearly portentous gibberish and Curzio’s Latin was dodgy to say the least.

GIF Image

Disagree with half of it, enjoy reading all of it

TRY 3 MONTHS FOR $5
Our magazine articles are for subscribers only. Start your 3-month trial today for just $5 and subscribe to more than one view

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in