Almost two decades ago, as a junior political reporter on the Evening Standard, I heard the cabinet office minister William Waldegrave tell a parliamentary committee that in certain circumstances it was right for a prime minister to lie. The words made no impression on the committee itself, but I nevertheless dashed up to my office in the press gallery and constructed a story around his observations, which duly appeared as the late edition Evening Standard splash.
The most enormous row followed. There were calls for poor Waldegrave’s resignation. The Labour opposition made out that his comment showed that no Conservative government could be trusted. This was terribly unfair. William Waldegrave, whatever his faults as a politician, is an exceptionally scrupulous man and his remarks reflected his painful and exacting honesty. There are indeed certain exceptional circumstances where politicians have a duty to lie to their electorates.
Today the argument continues to simmer, and the American political scientist John Mearsheimer has made a valuable contribution to the growing literature surrounding political lying.
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in