Honor Clerk

A short step from cradle to grave

Infants got burned, squashed or eaten by animals at home, while a mother’s propects were no less grim. It’s hard to know why Malthus was worried

issue 15 December 2018

Between 1300 and 1900 few things were more dangerous than giving birth. For poor and rich, the mortality rate was high. If the birth itself didn’t kill you, then puerperal fever very well might. Privacy was non-existent. If you were Marie de Medici, there was such a press of people in the lying-in chamber that you couldn’t get from the birthing chair to your bed — and that was not counting the 200 more in the ante-room.  Still worse, though, than giving birth was being born. In 16th- and 17th-century England, 20 per cent of children died before the age of five. If you managed to survive your arrival and four months of swaddled immobility, there was still every chance you might be burned, trodden on, eaten by animals in your home or squashed by your mother in bed. Hard to know what Malthus was worried about.

No drily academic treatise, this little book delivers just what the author promises in the introduction: exploring the art and artefacts of birth and infancy, from the later medieval period to the beginning of the 20th century in western Europe and North America.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in