Daniel Swift

A man for all ages

Jonathan Bate gives us Shakespeare the pagan — a devotee of the classics, writing for a post-Reformation England planning its own ‘neo-Roman’ empire

issue 27 April 2019

The deployment of Shakespeare to describe Brexit is by now a cliché. It might take the form of a quotation, be borrowed in a headline, or involve the name of one of the better-known characters; it might turn up in that most hollow of adjectives, Shakespearean. It has two possible modes. There is triumphalism drawn from the history plays: this sceptred isle, once more unto the breach. And there is tragic calamity: the betrayal by Brutus, Hamlet dithering. Nobody much invokes the comedies, perhaps because negotiations with the EU have not yet descended to cross-dressing.

Shakespeare is our national myth, most useful in a time of crisis, and an amazingly erudite new study by the Shakespeare scholar Jonathan Bate shows that this process of repurposing old stories has always been the point of Shakespeare. As Bate writes in How the Classics Made Shakespeare: ‘Ever since Anglo-Saxon times, the English had told their national stories in histories and legends, frequently drawing on comparisons with antiquity.

Comments

Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months

Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.

Already a subscriber? Log in