You’ve probably read about the English Bridge Union’s attempt to get bridge reclassified as a sport rather than a game — meaning that its members would no longer have to pay VAT on entry fees for competitions. Last month, a tax tribunal rejected the move on the grounds that ‘a sport normally connotes a game with an athletic element’. You may think this sounds reasonable enough, but, as my six-year-old daughter would say, it not fair!
Many other European countries, including France, Holland and Poland, classify bridge as a sport — as does the International Olympic Committee. And HMRC recognises games like darts, billiards and croquet as sports — hardly ‘athletic’ activities — so why not bridge?
It’s not as if bridge makes no physical demands on a player. At a competitive level, it is absolutely gruelling.
Comments
Join the debate for just $5 for 3 months
Be part of the conversation with other Spectator readers by getting your first three months for $5.
UNLOCK ACCESS Just $5 for 3 monthsAlready a subscriber? Log in